Mulvane v. City of South Topeka
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Shawnee District Court. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Green, C..:
The plaintiff in error instituted this suit in the district court of Shawnee county, to recover damages from the city of South Topeka for a failure to place danger signals at a point where a well-traveled way, which had been used, as he claimed, for more than fifteen years by the traveling public, although not a regularly laid-out road, intersected a street of such city which had been excavated a distance of some four or five feet below the surface across such traveled way.
At the April term, 1888, the case was tried by a jury, and resulted in favor of the city. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Zettler v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
- Goodin v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
3Cited by5 opinions
- Shuptrine v. HerronMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
- Kirkham v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Freer v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Calhoun v. City of MilanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
- City of Chicago v. McKennaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904