Legal Opinion

Mulvane v. City of South Topeka

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1890PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Shawnee District Court. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Green, C..:

The plaintiff in error instituted this suit in the district court of Shawnee county, to recover damages from the city of South Topeka for a failure to place danger signals at a point where a well-traveled way, which had been used, as he claimed, for more than fifteen years by the traveling public, although not a regularly laid-out road, intersected a street of such city which had been excavated a distance of some four or five feet below the surface across such traveled way.

At the April term, 1888, the case was tried by a jury, and resulted in favor of the city. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zettler v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  2. Goodin v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shuptrine v. HerronMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Kirkham v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Freer v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Calhoun v. City of MilanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
  5. City of Chicago v. McKennaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API