Legal Opinion

Freer v. City of Eugene

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

Plaintiff, a woman 38 years of age, brings this action to recover damages in the sum of $15,000 for personal injuries which she alleges were caused by falling on a dangerous and defective sidewalk constructed and maintained by the defendant municipality. The gravamen of the complaint is that the city failed to keep the sidewalk in a reasonably safe condition for the use of pedestrians.

The defendant denied the charge of negligence and alleged contributory negligence as an affirmative defense.

The cause was submitted to a jury and a verdict returned in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $200.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Griffin v. City of ChillicotheSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  2. Ray v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Earl v. City of Cedar RapidsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  4. Goodin v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  5. Quinn v. StedmanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clark v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1952
  2. Nation v. GueffroyOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Pomeroy v. City of IndependenceOregon Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API