Legal Opinion

City of Chicago v. McKenna

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 26, 1904No. Gen. No. 11,316PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action on the case for personal injuries. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Frank Baker, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1903.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Windes

March IS, 1901, appellee was injured by falling through an open space in the sidewalk, part of a viaduct' at 12th street, between Wentworth avenue and Canal street, Chicago, which was being repaired by a contractor of the Chicago Terminal Transfer R. R. Co., by authority of the city of Chicago. He brought suit for his injuries against the city of Chicago, a trial of which, before the court and a jury, resulted in a verdict and judgment thereon in favor of appellee for $25,000, from whmh the city has appealed.

¡Numerous questions are raised and discussed by counsel, all of which we have…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Goodin v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  2. Holding v. City of St. JosephMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. City of Chicago v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Mulvane v. City of South TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  5. City of Chicago v. BakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shuptrine v. HerronMississippi Supreme Court · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API