Legal Opinion

Fochetta v. Schlackman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 28, 1999PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered June 23, 1998, which directed production of certain demanded records, directed defendants’ attorney to answer questions and denied defendants’ motion for an extension of the discovery deadline, unanimously modified, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, to grant plaintiffs motion to compel disclosure of invoices subject to in camera inspection of the invoices and redaction of any information as to the nature of services rendered, and to grant the cross motion for an extension of the discovery deadline to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tekni-Plex, Inc. v. Meyner & LandisNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Collazo v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. Teich v. TeichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Measom v. Greenwich & Perry Street Housing Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 2002
  3. Wolfington v. Wolfington Body Co., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County2000
  4. Askari v. McDermott, Will & Emery, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
  5. People v. GreenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API