Legal Opinion

Teich v. Teich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 4, 1997PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Fern Fisher-Brandveen, J.), entered on or about February 5, 1997, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by defendant’s brief, directed defendant to produce copies of his attorney’s bills in this litigation redacted so as not to disclose privileged matter or attorney’s work product, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Upon review of the prior order entered on or about October 25, 1994 (David Saxe, J.), which was not appealed insofar as it directed defendant to produce all documents demanded by plaintiff in his possession or control (see, Harris v…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wolf v. WolfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. De La Roche v. De La RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Ennist v. ShepherdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Harris v. HirshNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Harris v. HirshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cypress Media, Inc. v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  2. Ehrich v. Binghamton City School DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2002
  3. Fochetta v. SchlackmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Fochetta v. SchlackmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Randall Co. LLC v. 281 Broadway Holdings LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API