In Re the Estate of Brodbeck v. James
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Pierron, J.:
Shirley Hall appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Ruth O. James and Dwight Hart (collectively referred to as proponents). Hall argues the will and codicil admitted to probate by proponents were the product of undue influence. We affirm the granting of summary judgment.
Esther Brodbeck executed a will on May 18,1988. She executed a second will, revoking all previous wills, on January 15, 1992, and enacted a first codicil on October 15,1993. Brodbeck died on December 28,1993. She had survived her husband and they had never had children. On January…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Denison State Bank v. MadeiraSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Mitzner Ex Rel. Bishop v. State, Kansas Department of Social & Rehabilitation ServicesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
- Kerns Ex Rel. Kerns v. G.A.C., Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994
- Richards v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
- Crooks v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1987
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re the Estate of HanebergSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Cresto v. CrestoSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- Heck v. ArcherCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996
- In Re Estate of FarrSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- Hall v. MartinDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.