Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Haneberg

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 8, 2000No. 83,870, 84,246PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by:

Abbott, J.:

This is a consolidated appeal from an order admitting Marie Haneberg’s will and codicil to probate. The district court admitted the will and codicil to probate after finding that appellant Arnold Reinert, the decedent’s nephew, had failed in his burden of proving “suspicious circumstances” and undue influence by certain will beneficiaries. Appellant Florence Haneberg Briney also appeals the district court’s finding that the devise to her twin sister, Francis Haneberg Ervin, lapsed when Francis predeceased Marie.

Marie Haneberg died testate…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Mohr v. State Bank of StanleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  2. Williams v. CrickmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Klose v. CollinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. In Re the Estate of WernetSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  5. Holmes v. Campbell CollegeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Owen Lumber Co. v. ChartrandSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  2. Mynatt v. CollisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  3. General Building Contractors, L.L.C. v. Board of Shawnee County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  4. Cresto v. CrestoSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  5. Hamel v. HamelSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API