Samsung International, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RESTANI, Judge:
This matter is before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment by Plaintiff Samsung International, Inc. (“Samsung”) and Defendant United States (“the Government”) pursuant to USCIT Rule 56. Samsung challenges the U.S. Bureau of Customs and Border Protection’s (“Customs”) liquidation of certain entries and its denial of Samsung’s protests relating to the classification of plasma televisions and video monitors. 1 Pl.’s Mot. and Mem. in Supp. for Summ. J. (“PL’s Br.”) 1. Samsung argues its imported plasma televisions and video monitors are eligible for preferential…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bausch & Lomb, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Warner-Lambert Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Rocknel Fastener, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Simod America Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Chemtall, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017