Bailey v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Drew,
This is an action in assumpsit by the plaintiff, May E. Bailey, to recover the amount of a life insurance policy issued by defendant company on the life of her sister, Nellie E. Potter, in which policy plaintiff was named as beneficiary. Defendant resists the claim on the ground that certain answers of the insured in her application for the insurance were false, fraudulent and untrue, and were given for the purpose of obtaining the policy by misrepresentation and fraud. The jury found for plaintiff in the amount of her claim; the lower court entered judgment for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Evans v. Penn Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
- Rigby v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Indovina v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Boltz v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
3Cited by25 opinions
- Freedman v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Prevete v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Travellers Insurance v. Heppenstall Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Kizirian v. United Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Derr v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.