Legal Opinion

Herbert v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 11, 1929No. 19665PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. The motion for a new trial contains thirteen grounds including the three general grounds. Following the thirteen grounds, as they appear in the record, the judge makes the following statement: “The foregoing amendment set out in ground thirteenth of the amended motion for new trial is allowed as prayed, and the recitals of fact therein contained are hereby approved as true. Ordered that the said amendment together with the proceeding [preceding?] nine amended grounds of the amended motion for new trial be filed as a part of the record in the case in which the said amendments are entitled.”…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Landrum v. LandrumSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  3. Brazil v. City or LaGrangeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
  4. Haygood v. Clark Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  5. Goolsby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rogers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API