Legal Opinion

Landrum v. Landrum

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 14, 1916PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Partition. Before Judge Patterson. Milton superior court. March 31, 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

1. If an instrument containing provisions in the nature of a conveyance of real estate is not properly attested or probated for record, the recording of it does not authorize a certified copy, as such, to be admitted in evidence on proof of the loss of the original paper; but if a copy taken from the record is proved to be a correct copy of the original, the mere fact that the original may have been improperly recorded without due attestation will not prevent the proved copy from being admitted in evidence like any other copy of the original made by a private person, upon proof of loss or…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. McLean v. MannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  2. Fowler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Collier v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. OglesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  5. Mims v. MimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API