Legal Opinion

Smith & Bird v. Kentucky River Mills, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 31, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEDINA, District Judge.

This is an application by G. Harry Jackson, as assignee of Smith &° Bird, to confirm, under the Federal Arbitration Act, Title 9 U.S.C.A. § 9, an alleged award of an arbitrator, dated December 30, 1947.

On April 10, 1944, Kentucky River Mills, Inc., entered into a written agreement for the purchase from Smith & Bird of 79 tons of Brazilian caroa fiber. Upon the refusal by Kentucky River Mills, Inc., to accept delivery, a demand for arbitration was served by registered mail pursuant to the terms of an arbitration clause in the contract which provided that “Any dispute…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. New York Lumber & Wood Working Co. v. SchniederNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  2. Brazill v. . IshamNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  3. Jackson v. Kentucky River MillsDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1946
  4. Burhans v. Union Free School District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. General Exchange Ins. Corporation v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kentucky River Mills v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  2. Rushton v. Howard Sober, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API