Smith & Bird v. Kentucky River Mills, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEDINA, District Judge.
This is an application by G. Harry Jackson, as assignee of Smith &° Bird, to confirm, under the Federal Arbitration Act, Title 9 U.S.C.A. § 9, an alleged award of an arbitrator, dated December 30, 1947.
On April 10, 1944, Kentucky River Mills, Inc., entered into a written agreement for the purchase from Smith & Bird of 79 tons of Brazilian caroa fiber. Upon the refusal by Kentucky River Mills, Inc., to accept delivery, a demand for arbitration was served by registered mail pursuant to the terms of an arbitration clause in the contract which provided that “Any dispute…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- New York Lumber & Wood Working Co. v. SchniederNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Brazill v. . IshamNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
- Jackson v. Kentucky River MillsDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1946
- Burhans v. Union Free School District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- General Exchange Ins. Corporation v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kentucky River Mills v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Rushton v. Howard Sober, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1961