Legal Opinion

People v. Brunsting

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided July 1, 2013No. Supreme Court Case No. 09SC323PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boatright

{ 1 In this appeal, we consider the exigent cireumstances exception to the Fourth Amendment's warrant requirement as it applies to the emergency created when officer safety is placed in jeopardy. We hold that officer safety concerns fall within the exigent cireumstances exception when "(1) the officers have an objectively reasonable basis to believe there is an immediate need to protect *1076the lives or safety of themselves or others, and (2) the manner and scope of the search is reasonable."1 We apply this test to the record in this case, and we conclude that the deputy sheriff's initial entry…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. HaydenSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Brigham City v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Oliver v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. BarryColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. People v. SchaufeleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  3. People v. AckermanSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  4. People v. LancasterColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. People v. MartinColorado Court of Appeals · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API