Legal Opinion

Molina v. Watkins

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 14, 2002No. Nos. 3D98-1747, 3D98-2053PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, J.

This is a consolidated appeal, brought by Ronald R. Molina, individually, and his company, Financial Capital of America, Inc. (“FCA”), from two separate judgments entered in favor of Floyd Watkins on a counterclaim. FCA’s judgment was entered pursuant to an ore tenus motion for default made by Watkins just prior to the start of trial when FCA’s counsel was permitted to withdraw. Molina’s judgment was entered pursuant to a jury verdict. For the reasons which follow we reverse both judgments, but remand with instructions that the trial court enter an interlocutory order in favor of FCA and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McGurn v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
  2. Szteinbaum v. Kaes Inversiones Y ValoresDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  3. Del Castillo v. Ralor Pharmacy, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
  4. Williams v. HinesSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  5. Gore v. HansenSupreme Court of Florida · 1952

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. East Avenue, LLC v. Insignia BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Baleanu v. SandulescuDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. Rauen v. City of MiamiDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2007
  4. Investacorp, Inc. v. EvansDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  5. Sieber v. GilDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API