Legal Opinion

(1996)

Maryland Attorney General Reports

Decided May 9, 1996Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Dr. Slan:

You have requested our interpretation of the provision of the Maryland Dentistry Act that prohibits anyone other than a licensee from being "a manager, a proprietor, or a conductor of" a dental office. Specifically, you ask whether the Board may interpret the Act to mean that, in the words of your letter, "the ownership of a business which provides dental services requires a license, the management of a business which provides dental services requires a license and the conducting of a business which provides dental services requires a license." Your related question is whether a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. BorenWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Prichard v. ConwayWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Taber v. State Board of Registration & Examination in DentistrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
  4. State ex rel. Board of Optometry v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1967
  5. People v. BoydenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API