Legal Opinion

Prichard v. Conway

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1951No. 31723PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

We are here concerned with the legality of the contract whereby a widow sold her deceased husband’s dental practice, including lease, equipment, accounts receivable, etc., and with her conduct with reference thereto. The question actually presented is the sufficiency of the amended complaint of the purchaser, which challenges the legality of the transaction. The trial court held that it does not state a cause of action, sustained a general demurrer, and entered an order of dismissal with prejudice, and the purchaser appeals.

It appears from the amended complaint and the exhibits attached…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BorenWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Damon v. LequeWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Fransioli v. ThompsonWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Dale v. CohnWashington Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Morelli v. EhsanWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Thompson v. HunstadWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Fallahzadeh v. GhorbanianCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Morelli v. EhsanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  5. Ahrens v. LadleyWashington Supreme Court · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API