Legal Opinion

Finkel v. Cumberland Realty Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided August 24, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

69 N.J. Super. 85 (1961)

173 A.2d 570

JENNIE FINKEL, PLAINTIFF,

v.

CUMBERLAND REALTY COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided August 24, 1961.

Mr. Stanley S. Brotman argued the cause for plaintiff (Messrs. Shapiro, Brotman & Eisenstat, attorneys).

Mr. John R. Armstrong argued the cause for plaintiff (Messrs. Kirkman, Mulligan, Bell & Armstrong, attorneys).

Mr. George Purnell argued the cause for defendant Cumberland Realty Company (Messrs. Curry, Purnell & Greene, attorneys).

WICK, J.S.C.

This…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Winberry v. SalisburySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  2. Wilford v. Sigmund Eisner Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  3. Labell v. QuasdorfSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  4. Miklos v. Liberty Coach Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. Goldfarb v. RoegerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Murphy v. Helena Rubinstein Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API