Legal Opinion

Smedley Co. v. Lansing

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided June 16, 1978No. FILE NO. 217PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDavid M. Shea, J.

The plaintiff brought this action on a check made and delivered by the defendant upon which the defendant stopped payment. The defendant claimed duress as justification for stopping payment on the check, which had been given in return for services rendered by the plaintiff in storing and trucking household furniture owned by the defendant, and he also counterclaimed for damage to some of the furniture. The trial court rendered judgment for the plaintiff on the complaint and on the counterclaim. From that judgment the defendant has appealed, assigning error in the facts found and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Weiner v. MinorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  2. Remington Arms Union Metallic Cartridge Co. v. Feeney Tool Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  3. Crittenden v. RoyceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Noble v. WhiteConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API