Legal Opinion
Crittenden v. Royce
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 31, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.
The plaintiff alleged in her complaint: “1. That on or about March 17, 1923, the plaintiff paid to the defendant under protest the sum of one thousand dollars to clear off a mortgage on property of the plaintiff, which was on that day sold to a third party. 2. Said mortgage and note should have been written four hundred dollars, as there was no consideration for the¡ six hundred dollars balance, and the defendant knéw this and yet demanded the full sum of one thousand dollars. 3. The defendant further demanded and accepted interest on said six hundred dollars, when as a matter of fact, as…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- First National Bank v. SargeantNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- United States v. New York & Cuba Mail Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Morris v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
3Cited by7 opinions
- H. E. Verran Co. v. Town of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
- Smedley Co. v. LansingConnecticut Superior Court · 1978
- Bauco v. Dominello, No. 33 31 75 (Apr. 7, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
- First Constitution Bank v. Veldhuis, No. 29 74 05 (May 22, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
- Perrotti v. Knox, No. Cv91-0321073 S (Jan. 25, 1994)Connecticut Superior Court · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.