Legal Opinion

Spencer v. VDO Instruments, Ltd.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided March 31, 1964No. Civ. No. 23515PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FREEMAN, District Judge.

This is an action by James M. Spencer, Jr., d/b/a Hurricane Marine Products, plaintiff, against VDO Tachometer Werke Adolph Schindling GmbH., a corporation of the Federal Republic of Germany (hereinafter referred to as “VDO”), VDO Instruments, Limited, a Canadian corporation (hereinafter referred to as “VDO, LTD.”), and Wood Marine, Inc., a Michigan corporation, based upon a 3-count amended complaint, to restrain the defendants from using the trade-mark “SUM LOG” issued to plaintiff by the United States Patent Office, on a com*736■bined nautical speedometer and mileage…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Saxlehner v. Eisner & Mendelson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Prestonettes, Inc. v. CotySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. A. Bourjois & Co., Inc. v. KatzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. United States Ozone Co. v. United States Ozone Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932
  5. Scandinavia Belting Co. v. Asbestos & Rubber Works of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. General Business Services, Inc. v. RouseDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Abercrombie & Fitch Co. v. Hunting World, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1971
  3. James M. Spencer, Jr., Doing Business as Hurricane Marine Products v. Vdo Instruments, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API