Legal Opinion
Selle v. City of Fayetteville
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 27, 1944No. 4-7473PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
No testimony was heard at the trial from which is this appeal, the case having been disposed of on the pleadings. We, therefore, copy so much of the pleadings as is necessary to present the questions involved.
Condemnation proceedings were instituted by the city of Fayetteville, under the authority of Act 135 of the Acts of 1929, Yol. 1, p. 705, to construct an airport. This act appears as §§ 10037-10041, Pope’s Digest. Section 2 of the act reads as follows :
“The real property for such airports or flying fields may be acquired by gift or purchase, or by the exercise of the right of eminent…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Richmond v. CarnealSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Young v. GurdonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Cunningham v. Memphis Railroad Terminal Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1912
- Bergman v. St. Paul, Stillwater & Taylor's Falls RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- South Carolina State Highway Department v. BobotesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Liles v. LilesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- W. R. Wrape Stave Co. v. Arkansas State Game & Fish CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Hampton v. Arkansas State Game & Fish CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
- Ellis v. Arkansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Pfeifer v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.