Legal Opinion
Young v. Gurdon
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided June 22, 1925PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.
In October, 1923, W. A. Young and his wife, L. E. Young, hereafter called appellants, instituted an action in the Clark Chancery Court against B. B. Young and the town of Gurdon et ad., alleging that they were the owners in fee simple of three lots in the town of Gurdon and seeking to enjoin the town and the -others named in the complaint from permitting trespasses upon such lots by -creating and -maintaining thereon public and private nuisances. A temporary injunction was issued in • accordance with the prayer of the complaint.
At the time of the institution of the action the town ' of Gurdon…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- North Laramie Land Co. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Sweet v. RechelSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Railway Co. v. PettySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
- City of Newton v. PerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Newbold v. StuttgartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- City of Little Rock v. RainesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Selle v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Pfeifer v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Holman v. City of DierksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
- Magness v. McEntireSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.