Legal Opinion

Hayman v. Wakeham

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1903No. Docket No 47PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from St. Clair; Law, J. Bill by Jennie Hayman and others against Harriet G. Wakeham to set aside certain deeds. From a decree dismissing thé bill, complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This case presents a question of fact. We have had the benefit of elaborate briefs and full oral argument. A statement of the case and the conclusions of the circuit judge are taken from the opinion of the circuit judge:

“ The complainants in this cause are the daughters and sons and heirs at law of Richard Wakeham, deceased. The defendant is the second wife of the said Richard Wakeham, deceased, and the stepmother of complainants. Defendant married said Richard Wakeham in 189?. After the said marriage Richard Wakeham went to the defendant’s home, where he lived with his said wife until his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Latham v. UdellMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Spencer v. Terry's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hawthorne v. DunnMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Wroblewski v. WroblewskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Potter v. ChamberlinMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Demerse v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Barrett v. SwisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API