Legal Opinion

Demerse v. Mitchell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 28, 1915No. Docket No. 86PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Marquette; Flannigan, J. Bill by Abilene Demerse and others against Elizabeth Mitchell and others for the cancellation of certain deeds. Defendants filed an answer in the nature of a cross-bill. From a decree for defendants, complainants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

After a careful consideration of the briefs in this case and a study of the record, we find that we are in entire accord with the learned trial judge upon *685his conclusions as to the facts and the legal questions therein involved. After having heard the case, the trial judge has given us the benefit of a carefully prepared and exhaustive opinion, of which we will adopt so much as is essential to a decision of the questions at issue:

“In the year 1866, Charles T. Harvey surveyed and laid out into lots, numbered from 1 to 18, inclusive, portions of sections 5 and 6, in township 47 N., of range 26…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Negaunee Iron Co. v. Iron Cliffs Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Lee v. ClaryMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Pellow v. Arctic Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Duffy v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Hayman v. WakehamMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jacobsen v. NieboerMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Harrell v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Hendricks v. WolfMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Mask v. Shell Oil Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Hillman v. HuittMichigan Supreme Court · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API