Legal Opinion

Ronning v. Way

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 19, 1912No. Civ. No. 1035PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Chas. Monroe, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an action to recover damages against the defendant as constable for an alleged wrongful conversion of property mortgaged to plaintiff.

The court gave judgment for plaintiff, from which, and an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant prosecutes this appeal.

The complaint alleges the execution to plaintiff of a mortgage upon certain personal property, situated at Whittier, in Los Angeles county, by one George A. Gray, a resident of Riverside county; that the mortgage was recorded in Los Angeles county only; that defendant on May 15, 1909, converted the mortgaged property by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Westbay v. GrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Cardenas v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. McMahon v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Old Settlers Investment Co. v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  5. First National Bank v. MenkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wolpert v. GriptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Teater v. Good Hope Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Stoudt v. HansonMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Curns v. BrannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Oller Oller v. CadiernoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API