Legal Opinion

Richey v. Stanley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 1, 1931No. 4016PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLSON, O. J.

(after Stating the case as above).

The contention here is that the finding of the trial court’that the truck was delivered to the constable within the meaning of article 6853, R. S. 1925, was without evidence to support it. The only testimony with refer- - ence to the matter was that of appellee H. F. Stanley as a witness that within ten days after the judgment was rendered against him he “got in his ear and went and offered the truck” to Richey and to the constable; that Richey said, “No, he did not want it (the truck) and would not have it” ; and that the constable said they…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bane v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  2. Jarecki Manufacturing Co. v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. St. George's Society v. SawyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
  4. Childs v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. Hartman v. StarkOregon Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wilson v. KleinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  2. Universal Credit Co. v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Cockrum v. Cal-Zona CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  4. Cornelius v. CookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  5. Kerr v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API