Legal Opinion

Cockrum v. Cal-Zona Corporation

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 4, 1963No. 16238PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATEMAN, Justice.

Garnishment proceedings. The appellee Cal-Zona Corporation sued out a writ of garnishment addressed to the appellee Mills-Brokerage Company and another in aid of its suit in the same court against Sidney Zimel for debt in the sum of $8,625.00. The garnishees answered that prior to the service of the writ Zimel had written them a letter stating that he had assigned his interest in the indebtedness to the appellant Jim Cockrum, and stating that if the assignment were effective garnishee would not be indebted to Sidney Zimel in any amount, but that if the assignment were not…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Fambrough v. WagleyTexas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Construction & General Labor Union, Local No. 688 v. StephensonTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Clegg v. VarnellTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  4. Seinsheimer v. FlanaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. Universal Credit Co. v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  2. Tri-State Pipe & Equipment, Inc. v. Southern County Mutual Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)1999
  3. Zeecon Wireless Internet, LLC v. American Bank of Texas, N.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2010
  4. Hudler-Tye Construction, Inc. v. Pettijohn & Pettijohn Plumbing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. Waldron v. Moody National Bank (In Re L & D Interests, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2006

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API