Legal Opinion

Toccoa Electric Power Co. v. Panter

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1933No. 9459PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

In Orr v. Webb, 112 Ga. 806 (38 S. E. 98), a decision rendered by four Justices, it was held: “A bill of exceptions should on its face affirmatively and unequivocally show who are the parties thereto; and, in strictly good practice, the plaintiff, or plaintiffs, and the defendant, or defendants, therein should be expressly designated as such eis nominibus. . . The abbreviation fet al.,’ when used in a bill of exceptions, can not be held to designate any person or persons,” In the opinion it was said: "The *261recitals in a bill of exceptions should in ever}' instance be sufficiently clear and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Orr v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  2. McEachin v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
  3. Everhart v. Atlantic Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  4. Farr v. FarrSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  5. Sistrunk v. PendletonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Patterson v. LauderbackCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  2. Daniel v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Hancock v. Lizella Fruit FarmSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937
  4. Lanier v. BaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1949
  5. Poteet v. BeaverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API