Legal Opinion

Reznik v. Friswell

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 21, 2003PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtin, J.

This is a Dist./Mun. Cts. R A. D. A., Rule 8C, appeal by plaintiff Mark Reznik (“Reznik”) of the allowance of defendant Judith Friswell’s (“Friswell”) Mass. R. Civ. P., Rule 41(b) (2), motion for involuntary dismissal and costs.

The record indicates that Reznik, pro se, commenced this negligence action on September 24, 2001 for injuries he allegedly sustained in an automobile accident with Friswell. The action itself appears to be, and certainly began as, a straightforward motor vehicle tort action. Yet by the time Friswell filed her motion to dismiss less than six months later, the docket…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bucchiere v. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Mains v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  3. Monahan v. WashburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  4. Massachusetts Broken Stone Co. v. Planning BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
  5. Avelino-Wright v. WrightMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Reznik v. FriswellMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
  2. Reznik v. GaraffoMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2006
  3. Aden v. LudvigsenMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2003
  4. Brothers v. LippMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004
  5. Jillson Co. v. ReznikMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API