Aden v. Ludvigsen
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
The defendants, John F. Ludvigsen and John F. Ludvigsen, trustee of I.T. Trust (“Ludvigsen”),1 appeal pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts. R. A. D. A, Rule 8C, the allowance of the motion of the plaintiff, Abdulcadir M. Aden (“Aden”), for summary judgment. Because of the sparse record provided us, we cannot ascertain that Ludvigsen properly set forth specific facts in opposition to Aden’s motion so as to create a genuine issue of material fact, and so dismiss the appeal.
Aden brought this action against Ludvigsen to recover monies owed on a rental agreement for certain commercial premises in Jamaica…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Bergendahl v. Massachusetts Electric Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998
- LoCicero v. Hartford Insurance GroupMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988
- USTrust Co. v. KennedyMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Yetman v. CavanaghMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007
- Hatch Mott MacDonald v. SaiaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2007