Commonwealth v. Gaskins
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’BRIEN, ROBERTS, NIX and MANDERINO, Justices.
Appellant, Clenzell Gaskins, was convicted by a jury of murder of the first degree for the shooting death of Robert Speakes. After post-trial motions were denied, he was sentenced to life imprisonment. This direct appeal followed.1
While appellant presents several alleged errors for our review, we need only discuss one of them. Gas-kins, a juvenile when he was arrested on this charge, argues that certain inculpatory statements given to the *240police’ should be suppressed because he did not have an opportunity to consult with an interested adult…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FutchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. McCutchenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. MitchellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. RoaneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. ChaneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. HernandezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. VeltreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. HendersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.