Commonwealth v. Smith
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
. OPINION OF THE COURT
NIX, Justice.
This appeal again raises the troublesome issue as to when an accused under the age of 18 years may effec*495tively waive his constitutional rights prior to custodial interrogation.1 For the reasons set forth hereinafter we are constrained to reverse the judgments of sentence and award the grant of a new trial.
On November 7, 1974, appellant, Barry Smith, a 17-year-old youth, fired six shots in the direction of another youth who was a member of a rival gang. The bullets missed the intended victim and struck Crystal Loney and Batina Brooks, two innocent bystanders,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Gallegos v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Commonwealth v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. McCutchenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Commonwealth v. FoganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HughesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- State in Interest of DinoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- Ex Parte WhisenantSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- State v. TurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Commonwealth v. a JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.