Legal Opinion

O'Hara v. Kelly

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided August 11, 2020No. 3:18-cv-01575Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON KEVIN O’HARA, Case No. 3:18-cv-01575-MC Petitioner, OPINION AND ORDER v. BRANDON KELLY, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary Respondent. _______________________________ MCSHANE, District Judge: Petitioner brings this Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his state court convictions on grounds that he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. Petitioner fails to show that the Oregon court decision denying his claims unreasonably applied clearly established federal law. The Petition is DENIED. BACKGROUND…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Schriro v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API