Harris v. Doyle
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Montmorency; Emerick, J. Log-lien proceedings by James Harris and William Culley against Augustus Doyle, principal defendant, and Robert Rea, log owner. From judgments for plaintiff's, defendant Rea brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.
These are companion cases, and were heard together. The respective plaintiffs worked for the principal defendant, Doyle, in cutting and skidding, in Montmorency county, logs belonging to Robert Rea, *471Doyle being under contract obligations with Rea to cut and skid the same. The last day’s work was done on March 26, 1901. On the 11th day of April, 1901, each plaintiff made and verified a statement of lien upon the hemlock logs in question, and it is claimed on their behalf that they were filed with the clerk of Montmorency county upon the same day. On April 26, 1901, each plaintiff made and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Parks v. GoodwinMichigan Supreme Court · 1843
- Field v. AshleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Brown v. Pontiac Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Burlingame v. MarbleMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Huntoon v. O'BrienMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by2 opinions
- Miller Bros. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- American Copying Co. v. SternMichigan Supreme Court · 1907