Legal Opinion

Huntoon v. O'Brien

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 1890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Attachment proceedings under log-lien law. Defendant log-owner brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Patrick O'Brien, the defendant, was employed as a contractor by the owner of the logs upon which a lien was 'declared for labor performed by the plaintiff upon the products described in the plaintiff's declaration. O'Brien failed to pay the plaintiff for said work in skidding a portion of said logs, who filed a statement of lien, through his father, Isaac F. Huntoon, who is described as agent in the body of the statement, but who signs his name, “ Isaac F. Huntoon, Claimant,” in the county clerk's office for Muskegon county, and instituted and carried on proceedings for the enforcement of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bills v. KeeslerMichigan Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harris v. DoyleMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API