Parks v. Goodwin
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to the Oakland Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtRansom, J.
This was an action of assumpsit, commenced by summons, before a justice of the peace of Oakland county. The defendants in error, who were the plaintiffs below, were non-residents, and neglected to file security for costs. The plaintiffs moved the justice on this ground to set aside the summons ; whereupon the defendants filed security for costs. The court then refused to grant the plaintiff’s motion.
*57The statute in force at the time this suit was commenced, (R. S. 405, § 51,) required that, in all cases, nonresident plaintiffs should give security for costs before process issued. It is urged…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Hatcher v. . RocheleauNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Brown v. Pontiac Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Dillon v. HoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
- Harris v. DoyleMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Bruce v. HoldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1839
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.