Legal Opinion

Parks v. Goodwin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1843PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to the Oakland Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRansom, J.

This was an action of assumpsit, commenced by summons, before a justice of the peace of Oakland county. The defendants in error, who were the plaintiffs below, were non-residents, and neglected to file security for costs. The plaintiffs moved the justice on this ground to set aside the summons ; whereupon the defendants filed security for costs. The court then refused to grant the plaintiff’s motion.

*57The statute in force at the time this suit was commenced, (R. S. 405, § 51,) required that, in all cases, nonresident plaintiffs should give security for costs before process issued. It is urged…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hatcher v. . RocheleauNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Brown v. Pontiac Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Dillon v. HoweMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Harris v. DoyleMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Bruce v. HoldenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1839

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API