Pecinosky v. Oklahoma Aid Ass'n.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HERR, C.
This is an action brought by Myrtle Pecinosky against the Oklahoma Aid Association, defendant, to recover on two life insurance policies issued by defendant to Sarah Elrod, mother of plaintiff.
The -defense was settlement, release and cancellation, and fraudulent representations made by the insured in procuring the policies. ¡
It is alleged by defendant that it paid plaintiff the sum of $300 in settlement of her claim; that such claim was settled, a re-r lease executed by plaintiff, and the policies canceled. Defendant -prays that plaintiff be required to return the said sum so received…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- St. Louis S. F. Ry. Co. v. RichardsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926
- Miller v. Spokane International Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Franklin v. WebberOregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Carver v. Kansas Fraternal CitizensSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
3Cited by5 opinions
- Aubrey Tinsley Sade v. Northern Natural Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Duffy Theatres, Inc. v. Griffith Consol. Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Great American Life Ins. Co. v. LoveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Southwestern Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. WamplerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Oklahoma Aid Ass'n v. PecinoskySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936