Legal Opinion

Carver v. Kansas Fraternal Citizens

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1918No. 21,729PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte district court, division No. 3; William H. McCamish, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*825The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff commenced this action to recover from the defendant $1,000, one-half of the amount named in a beneficiary certificate issued by the defendant to Daniel Gorman Carver, the plaintiff’s husband. The other $1,000 had been paid under a compromise and settlement which, the plaintiff alleged, had been brought about by the ■ fraudulent representations of the defendant. The jury found in favor of the plaintiff.

1.- The defendant says:

“The principal question in this case, if not the only one, is whether or not there was a valid…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad v. DoyleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Sharrer v. Capitol Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. GoodholmSupreme Court of Kansas · 1900
  4. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance v. WoodsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  5. Farragher v. Knights & Ladies of SecuritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Wade v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Koshka v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanySupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. Carter v. UhrichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  4. Evans v. AylwardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  5. Harrison v. First Nat. Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API