McCormick v. National Surety Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Chickering, Thomas & Gregory, and J. J. Burt, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
Action against surety on a statutory undertaking given for the purpose of having an attachment discharged pursuant to sections 554 and 555 of the Code of Civil Procedure. Judgment went for plaintiff in the court below, and from the judgment and an order denying a new trial defendant appeals.
The plaintiff herein brought a former action against the Stockton and Tuolumne County Railroad Company, a corporation, and its president, Annie Kline Rikert, to recover from them $5,710, with, interest, etc., on a written contract for the direct payment of money, etc., alleged to have been made by both the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Poole v. DyerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- McMillan v. DanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
- McCutcheon v. WestonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Heynemann v. EderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
3Cited by13 opinions
- People v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- In Re the Estate of RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Central Heights Improvement Co. v. Memorial Parks, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Bailey v. Aetna Indemnity Co., of HartfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Passow & Sons v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.