Legal Opinion
Reed v. Mississippi Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided October 2, 2003No. 3:03-cv-00747PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BARBOUR, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion to Remand. Having considered the Motion, Response, Rebuttal, attachments to each, and supporting and opposing authority, the Court finds that the Motion is well taken and should be granted.
In addition, Defendant Washington Mutual Home Loans, Inc. has filed a Motion to Strike a Letter attached to Plaintiffs Rebuttal Brief for her Motion to Remand. Having considered the Motion, the Court finds that this Motion is well taken and should be granted.
I. Background and Procedural History 1
On or about August…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Southmark Corp. v. Coopers & LybrandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Thais Carriere, Widow of Samuel Carriere, Iv, Individually and on Behalf of Her Minor Child v. Sears, Roebuck and CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Drexel Burnham Lambert Group, Inc. v. Vigilant Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. McLeskey (In Re Bay Vista of Virginia, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
- Boland v. Crum (In Re Brown)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2007
- Crum v. Tomlinson (In Re Hettick)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2009
- Obsidian Solutions, LLC F/N/A Arco Ideas, LLC v. KBIDC Investments LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2021