Legal Opinion

Gregorio Roman and Wife, Maria L. Roman v. A. H. Robins Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 8, 1975No. 75-1784PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Per curiam

This products liability case is an appeal from a directed verdict in favor of the defendant drug company. Because we agree with the apparent finding of the District Court that the disabled plaintiff’s claim is barred by the appropriate Texas statute of limitations, we affirm.

The plaintiff, Mrs. Roman, suffered from a recurring kidney infection and in June 1968, was given a prescription by her employer, Dr. Alberto Melgar, for Sulla, a drug produced by the defendant, A. H. Robins Co. She also received samples of the drug from a Robins Company representative at Dr. Melgar’s request. On July 16,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gaddis v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Nichols v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Hays v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Stubbs v. Lowrey's HeirsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Joy v. JoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Albert E. Albertson v. T.J. Stevenson & Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  2. Anthony v. Koppers Co., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  4. Insurance Co. of North America v. Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  5. Lee Ann Timberlake v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API