Lee Ann Timberlake v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RANDALL, Circuit Judge:
In this diversity case governed by Texas law, plaintiff-appellant Lee Ann Timber-lake appeals the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee A.H. Robins Company. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
I. Factual and Procedural Background.
Timberlake was fitted with a Daikon Shield intrauterine device (IUD) in May of 1974. The Daikon Shield was manufactured and marketed by Robins. Timberlake wore the IUD without adverse effect for approximately four years. In March, 1978, Timberlake developed various symptoms, including lower abdominal pain,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Gaddis v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Robinson v. WeaverTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Nichols v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Hays v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Garcia v. Texas Instruments, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Seatrax, Inc. v. Sonbeck International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Gideon v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Neeley v. Bankers Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Thomas v. Barton Lodge II, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Anthony v. Abbott LaboratoriesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.