Legal Opinion

City of Indianapolis, Etc. v. Wynn

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1959No. 29,724Published

1Opinion

*582On Petition for Rehearing

Bobbitt, J.

Michael L. Fansler, a distinguished former member of this court, and Gustav H. Dongus, both members of the Indianapolis Bar, have filed a brief as amici curiae on rehearing in which they assert that both the 1955 Act,1 and the 1949 Act2 are unconstitutional insofar as they attempt to vest the trial court with jurisdiction to determine whether the annexation is in the best interests of the city.

Amicus curiae must accept a case as he finds it. 3 C. J. S., Amicus Curiae, §3(c), p. 1049.

The question which amici curiae seek to present here was not raised by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. LightheiserIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. City of Indianapolis, Etc. v. WynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Armstrong v. HuftyIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. KING v. City of BloomingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Jones v. StawickiIndiana Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API