Legal Opinion

United States v. Modanlo

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 1, 2013No. Crim. No. 10-0295 PJMPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PETER J. MESSITTE, District Judge.

In this multi-count criminal prosecution, the Government has charged Nader Mo-danlo with one count of obstructing an official proceeding (the “bankruptcy obstruction” charge). See 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c). It alleges that Modanlo lied to the Bankruptcy Court of this district about his relationship with a Swiss company, “Prospect Telecom AG.” Modanlo claims that since the Bankruptcy Court has already rejected all allegations relevant to that relationship, the Government is collaterally estopped from relitigating the criminal bankruptcy obstruction…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. United States v. International Building Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. United States v. Gordon R. Tatum, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. LedéeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. Colon-LedeeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. Nader ModanloCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
  4. United States v. ModanloDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2013
  5. Al Dosari v. McCormickUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API