Legal Opinion
United States v. Modanlo
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 13, 2013No. Crim. No. 10-0295 PJMPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PETER J. MESSITTE, District Judge.
The Court is once again, although this time for different reasons, called to pass upon Nader Modanlo’s contention that the Government is collaterally es-topped from criminally prosecuting him for (1) conspiring to violate and ultimately violating the United States trade embargo on Iran, 31 C.F.R. § 560.201 et seq., (2) money laundering, 18 U.S.C. § 1957(a), and (3) bankruptcy obstruction, 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c). The Court DENIES Modanlo’s Motion to Dismiss the Third Superseding Indictment as Barred by Article IV of the *386United States…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- In Re: Genesys Data Technologies, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Ivan D. JONES, Jr., Petitioner, v. SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- In Re: United Artists Theatre Company, Debtors v. Donald F. Walton, Acting United States Trustee for Region 3 Donald F. WaltonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. LedéeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Colon-LedeeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Hart (In re Hart)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · 2016