Legal Opinion
Aho v. Maragos
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 26, 1998No. Civil 970265PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Alex Maragos appealed from a summary judgment quieting title to mineral interests in Gloria Aho, Beverly J. Hamel, and Darlene Aliff. We conclude the district court erred in denying Maragos’s motion for a continuance to conduct further discovery, and we reverse.
[¶ 2] Edwin and Mildred Feland owned the property in question and, in 1984, named Maragos their agent to clear title to the property. In 1988 the Felands granted an oil and gas lease with a primary term of three years to Maragos. In 1990, Maragos brought an action to quiet title to the mineral interests…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rommie STULTS and Stephen Wallace, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CONOCO, INC. and Brad Burmaster, Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Resolution Trust Corporation v. North Bridge Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Gary Bryant v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Gabriel St. Surin v. Virgin Islands Daily News, Inc. Brodhurst Printery, Inc., D/B/A St. Croix AvisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Choice Financial Group v. SchellpfefferNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Riemers v. Peters-RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Vicknair v. Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Aho v. MaragosNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Maragos v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.