Hicks v. Hill Aeronautical School

Defendant assigns as error: (1) That the court erred in adjudging that plaintiff was entitled to recover possession of said airplane from defendant; (2) That the court erred in entering a judgment against the defendant for the balance due upon the conditional sales contract; (3) That the court erred in setting aside and vacating its first judgment and entering a judgment adjudging to plaintiff the right to the possession of said airplane.

Defendant contends that there was no sufficient proof of a demand by plaintiff for the possession of the personal property.

The testimony shows that Mr. Prank…