Legal Opinion

Tucker v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1959Published

1Opinion of the Court

216 Or. 74 (1959)

337 P.2d 979

TUCKER

v.

STATE INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued June 12, 1958.

Modified and remanded April 15, 1959.

Earl M. Preston, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General, and Ray H. Lafky, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

C.S. Emmons, Albany, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Willis, Kyle & Emmons, Albany.

Before PERRY,[*] Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, LUSK, WARNER, McALLISTER,[**] and SLOAN, Justices.

MODIFIED AND REMANDED.

McALLISTER, C.J.

In this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. OgdenOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Heuchert v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Armstrong v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Burrows v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Tucker v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API