Legal Opinion

Tucker v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1959PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALLISTER, C.J.

In this ease the plaintiff, Lyall Tucker, seeks to recover benefits allegedly due him under the Workmen’s Compensation Law, hereinafter referred to as the act. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff and from the judgment based thereon, the defendant, State Industrial Accident Commission, appeals.

Plaintiff alleges in his complaint that he was employed by the Cedar Creek Logging Company in its logging operations in Linn county and that both he and his employer were subject to the act. That for sometime prior to July 16, 1955, he had been afflicted with a hernia but had suffered no…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. OgdenOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Heuchert v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Armstrong v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Burrows v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Yokota v. LindsayOregon Supreme Court · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Daugharty v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. StarkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  3. Soott v. Lawrence Warehouse Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. State v. JosephOregon Supreme Court · 1962
  5. McBride v. Wetmore & Parman, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API