Legal Opinion
Long v. UAW Local No. 674
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 25, 2008No. 1:07-cv-268PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
SANDRA S. BECKWITH, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 11). Plaintiff opposes the motion (Doc. 14), and Defendants have replied. (Doc. 17) Defendants contend they are entitled to judgment on all of Plaintiffs claims, which arise out of Plaintiffs loss of his position as shop chairman of Local 674 following a recall election.
For the reasons discussed below, the Court finds the Defendants’ motion should be granted.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The facts giving rise to this dispute, although largely undisputed, are viewed in a light most favorable to…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Slater v. APWUDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022